I had Gustas Germanavicius on the podcast. He runs InRento out of Vilnius.

It’s a real estate debt platform, but not in the way people usually think about it. They’re not funding big speculative builds. They’re financing existing properties that already generate cash or can be fixed up quickly.

A lot of what they do is tied to a simple problem in Europe. It takes too long to build anything new. Permits drag on. Projects stall. Costs stack up. By the time something is finished, it’s more expensive than it should be.

So they skip that entire process. They focus on renovation. Old buildings. Misused space. Things that can be turned around in under a year and put back into circulation...

Today I ran a short, hands-on session for Keep Going on OpenClaw 101, a plain look at what people mean when they say “AI agents” and how they actually work in practice.

An agent is just a chatbot with access. It can reach into your files, your email, your servers, and your tools.

In this video I show a live setup. We ran OpenClaw on a Raspberry Pi, connected it to Telegram, and used it to make real changes. It edited a website header, sent emails, created a simple site, and monitored inputs, all from short prompts.

Gradient Ascendant

How to OpenClaw your Raspberry Pi

The tech world has gone gaga for OpenClaw, a project that lets you run an always-on AI agent; give it “skills” such as deploying code, searching the web, or summarizing your emails; and communicate with it via Slack or Telegram. Is this fun and interesting? I think yes! Are people doing fun and interesting things…

Read more

22 days ago · 9 likes · Jon Evans

I also spent time on the risks. Giving a system this level of access is not trivial. It can write code, trigger actions, and touch production systems. It is useful, but it demands caution.

The goal was simple: I wanted to strip away the hype and show what this looks like up close and how it works. As a fan of exploring new tech, I hope you enjoy this quick video and I’ll probably do another one in a few weeks...

Work is eating our lives. That much feels obvious. What is less obvious is why we let it happen.

I spoke with psychologist and author Guy Winch about his new book Mind Over Grind, which looks at a familiar but poorly understood problem: the slow psychological takeover that happens when work becomes the dominant force in a person’s life. Many of us think we are simply tired or busy. Winch argues that something more corrosive is happening, a kind of sustained dread that alters how we think, how we behave at home, and how we relate to the people around us.

The timing is not accidental. The workplace is changing in ways that make people uneasy. The pandemic briefly pushed companies to talk about emotional health and work life balance, but the underlying pressure never really went away. Burnout continued to rise. Now a new layer of uncertainty has appeared in the form of AI, automation, and the constant sense that entire professions may shift under our feet.

That uncertainty produces a specific emotional state. Winch calls it dread. It is not simple stress or boredom. It is the heavy anticipation of something bad that may happen but cannot be clearly defined.

Psychologists have studied this kind of anticipation in laboratory settings. In one set of experiments people were given a choice between receiving a mild electrical shock later or a stronger one immediately. Many participants chose the stronger shock simply to avoid waiting for the mild one. The anticipation itself was so unpleasant that people preferred to get the pain over with.

Work can produce the same effect. When people wake up already dreading the day ahead, the stress does not remain confined to office hours. It bleeds into everything else.

A common pattern looks like this. Someone finishes work but cannot mentally leave it behind. They replay conversations with colleagues, worry about tomorrow’s meetings, and anticipate problems that have not yet happened. These thoughts arrive uninvited. They intrude during dinner, while watching television, while trying to fall asleep. The result is hours of unpaid emotional overtime.

The damage compounds quickly. Poor sleep makes people more reactive the next day. Emotional withdrawal leads to tension with partners and family members. Hobbies, friendships, and personal interests slowly fall away because the person feels too drained to engage with them. Over time the individual begins to lose parts of themselves that once had nothing to do with work.

Winch has seen this pattern repeatedly. He also admits that he has experienced it himself. That admission is important, because the problem is not limited to employees trapped inside rigid corporate structures. It often appears even more strongly among founders, freelancers, and people who run their own businesses.

Self employed workers do not have a boss setting limits on how much they can push themselves. If you are ambitious and motivated, there is always more to do. A new client to chase. Another product to ship. Another email to send. The boundary between effort and obsession can disappear without anyone noticing.

Technology complicates the picture further. AI systems can now perform many of the small tasks that once filled the workday. Drafting emails, organizing schedules, producing summaries, even generating reports can be handled automatically.

In theory this should reduce pressure. In practice it often does the opposite.

People rarely use saved time to step away from work. Instead they fill the space with more tasks. At the same time the presence of automation introduces a deeper anxiety. If a machine can handle part of your job today, it may handle the rest tomorrow. Entire professions now operate under that shadow.

Even psychologists are not immune. Winch mentioned that some of his clients already consult large language models when he is unavailable. Others bring AI generated advice into therapy sessions and ask whether it matches his recommendations. The implication is obvious. If a machine can simulate the voice of expertise, what happens to the human expert?

These questions are still unfolding. Researchers have only begun to examine the psychological consequences of widespread AI interaction. One emerging concern involves emotional attachment to digital agents. Some people now describe their AI assistants as companions or collaborators.

Winch views that development cautiously. Emotional attachment to software may signal that other relationships have weakened. When work dominates a person’s attention and energy, connections with family, friends, and communities can erode. In that context it is not surprising that people begin forming attachments in strange places.

None of this means that work itself is the enemy. Winch argues that work occupies a central place in human life for understandable reasons.

Most people spend more waking hours working than doing anything else. Work provides income, which satisfies basic needs like shelter and food. It also offers social structure, status, identity, and a sense of accomplishment. Much of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, from security to self esteem, flows through employment.

Because of that, threats to work feel existential. Losing a job does not only mean losing income. It can mean losing status, routine, social networks, and a sense of purpose. The unconscious mind interprets those risks as serious dangers, which helps explain why dread becomes such a powerful emotion.

The real question is how to prevent work from overwhelming everything else.

Winch’s approach is pragmatic rather than philosophical. He focuses on specific behaviors that interrupt the cycle of rumination and anxiety.

One of the most common traps involves replaying workplace conflicts or uncertainties long after the workday ends. The brain returns to the same problem repeatedly because it has not identified a resolution. The solution is to convert the worry into a concrete plan.

If you are stewing about an argument with a colleague, the task becomes identifying what outcome you want and how you might achieve it. Do you need a conversation to clear the air. Do you need to set boundaries. Do you need to escalate the issue or simply move on. Spending fifteen minutes outlining a response can quiet the brain because the uncertainty has been reduced.

In cases where the problem cannot be solved immediately, scheduling time to address it later can have a similar effect. Writing “handle client issue tomorrow at 8:45 a.m.” into a calendar signals to the mind that the concern has not been ignored. The worry is parked for later rather than allowed to circulate endlessly.

Another element involves the structure of the workday itself. Many people respond to overwhelming workloads by pushing forward without pause. They move from meeting to meeting, task to task, trying to survive the day.

Ironically this behavior reduces productivity. Cognitive performance declines as fatigue accumulates. Creativity, judgment, and executive functioning all deteriorate when the brain remains under continuous strain.

Short restorative breaks can interrupt that decline. A few minutes of physical movement, a brief walk outside, or a supportive conversation with a colleague can reset mental resources. What matters is that the break genuinely restores energy rather than adding more stimulation. Doomscrolling through social media or reading the news rarely qualifies.

These techniques are modest but practical. They require attention rather than radical lifestyle changes. Most people already spend hours each evening mentally revisiting work problems. Redirecting a fraction of that time toward structured reflection can produce a noticeable difference.

The deeper question that emerged during our conversation concerns the future of work itself. If automation eventually provides widespread basic income and eliminates many traditional jobs, what replaces the psychological role of employment?

Winch does not pretend to know the answer. Work provides purpose, competition, creativity, and social structure. If those elements disappear, people will almost certainly invent new forms of aspiration to fill the gap. Humans rarely remain idle for long.

The shape of those aspirations remains unclear. They might emerge in artistic communities, local organizations, scientific exploration, or forms of competition that do not yet exist. What matters is that the underlying psychological drive toward goals and progress will remain.

For now the immediate challenge is simpler. Work has always demanded effort and attention. What has changed is the degree to which it invades the rest of life. Phones keep us connected to the office at all hours. Global competition raises expectations. AI adds uncertainty about what the future holds.

The result is a quiet epidemic of dread that many people treat as normal.

It is not normal. It is a signal that the balance between effort and recovery has collapsed.

Rebuilding that balance does not require abandoning ambition or disengaging from work. It requires noticing how the mind responds to pressure and intervening before the grind becomes the only thing left.